Legal Opinion
In re Quincy K.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a child protective proceeding, the petitioner has the burden *945of proving neglect by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Philip M., 82 NY2d 238, 243 [1993]; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1, 3 [1985]; Matter of Besthani M., 13 AD3d 452, 452 [2004]). Here, contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court’s finding of neglect based on the use of excessive corporal punishment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Chanyae S. [Rena W.], 82 AD3d 1247, 1247 [2011]; Matter of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Philip M.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re Tammie Z.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Joshua B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Isaiah S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Joseph O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Candacy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Candacy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Seth G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Seth G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013