In re Joseph O.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), dated March 17, 2005, which found that he had neglected the subject child.
Ordered that the fact-finding order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof finding that the father neglected the child by his excessive consumption of alcohol resulting in physical and emotional harm to the child; as so modified, the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A “neglected child” is defined, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Todd D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Katie R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Sal D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Stephanie R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Rakim W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re Alexander M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Crystal S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Chanika B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Blaize F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Richard R. v. CarrionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.