Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glaze v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1924No. 5 Div. 433Published

1DissentSamfobd, J.

It seems to me that the majority is in error in this case, in that they have assumed without sufficient proof that the “beer” or “mash” from which whisky is distilled is capable of being used for beverage purposes. As used in our statutes defining the term (Acts 1915, p. 1, § 1, and Acts 1919, p. 7, § 1), the word liquor is not used in that broad sense, which means any fluid or liquid, but is used in conjunction with the word beverage. Section 1, Acts 1915, begins: The term “prohibited liquors and beverages;” and throughout the entire system of laws enacted in this state the evident intent of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Luther v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. HawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  4. The Bd. of Commr's of Excise of Tompkins Cty. v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Austin v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API