Noss Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
The plaintiff in this action contests the classification by the United States Customs Service (Customs) of a certain device, invoiced as a centrifugal cleaner and known as a Radiclone, which is used for treating pulp in the papermaking process. Both plaintiff’s position and defendant’s position in this case are supported and with merit. The defendant, however, prevails since its claimed classification under item 661.95 is sustainable and is given precedence by virtue of headnote 1 of Schedule 6, part 4, subpart A, TSUS. 1
The subject merchandise was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arthur L. Franklin (Doing Business as Health Technologies Network) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Deringer v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Franklin v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Noss Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.