Legal Opinion

United States v. John Matthew Boston and Ernest Moore

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 12, 1974No. 1234, 1235, Dockets 74-1451, 74-1491PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKEL, District Judge:

Appellants, John Matthew Boston and Ernest Moore, were found guilty by a jury on April 5, 1974, of robbing a federally insured bank, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and of employing deadly weapons in the commission of that robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d). Both received concurrent sentences of 20 years in prison. Upon the ample evidence, and for the reasons hereinafter outlined, we overrule the several grounds of appeal and affirm the convictions.

I. The Robbery

From the evidence for the prosecution in the five-day trial (no evidence being offered by defendants), the jury was entitled,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Robert P. Marchand, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Howard M. Bronstein and Douglas P. PenningtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API