Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 26, 2009No. 05-75772Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE ESTUARDO ESTRADA, aka Jose  Fermin Estrada, No. 05-75772 Petitioner, v.  Agency No. A070-184-862 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney OPINION General, Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 4, 2009* Pasadena, California Filed March 26, 2009 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Rymer *The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Minh Duc Luu-Le v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. MANRIQUEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
  4. Jesus Ramon Cardenas-Uriarte v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Vacilio Aguiluz-Arellano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API