Legal Opinion

Courtney v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1892No. 193PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant was indicted under section 2085, R. S. 1881, relating to the offence of being a common gambler, the charge against the appellant being that he, on the 1st of October, 1889,and on divers other days between said day and the making of the presentment (October 26th, 1889), at, etc., did then and there unlawfully, for the purpose of gaming with cards, frequent a place where gambling was then permitted, to wit, the building and room of Albert Muhllisen, then and there situated, contrary, etc.

The appellant pleaded in abatement in four paragraphs, each sworn to by him separately, to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Batten v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Higgins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Rennert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Townsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API