Marriage of Hamm v. Hamm
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
COMBS, V.C.J.,
with whom WINCHESTER, J., joins, concurring specially:
1 1 While I agree with the majority's decision that Petitioner's appeal should be dismissed, I write separately to emphasize the problems inherent in dismissing Petitioner's appeal while allowing Respondent's own appeal to proceed. The majority applies what has long been the general rule in Oklahoma: a party to an action who voluntarily accepts the benefits of a judgment waives the right to appeal. Adams v. Unterkircher, 1985 OK 96, ¶ 7, 714 P.2d 193; United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Const., Inc., 1980 OK 139, ¶ 14, 641 P.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Berget v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.