Frank v. Frank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Yic-e-Chancellor Griffin, who filed the following opinion: “The purpose of this suit is to declare the existence of a partnership between two brothers, Moe and Louis Frank, masons and plasterers, and for an accounting, and to have it declared that certain lands, in the city of Bayonne, mentioned in the bill, standing in the name of Louis, are partnership property, or that a resulting trust exists therein in favor of…
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Yic-e-Chancellor Griffin, who filed the following opinion: “The purpose of this suit is to declare the existence of a partnership between two brothers, Moe and Louis Frank, masons and plasterers, and for an accounting, and to have it declared that certain lands, in the city of Bayonne, mentioned in the bill, standing in the name of Louis, are partnership property, or that a resulting trust exists therein in favor of Moe. “In 1910 Moe was nineteen years of age, -and, as I recall it, Louis was not quite twenty-one. They were engaged in…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court 'below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Busktrk — 14. For reversal — None.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lang v. HexterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Pappas v. VenetsanosCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933