Legal Opinion
Lang v. Hexter
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 21, 1945No. Docket 149/710PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The quality of omniscience could be exceedingly serviceable to judges who so often labor in quest of the obscure truth. Did the complainant, Harry H. Lang, and one Percy K. Hexter, now deceased, agree jointly to embark upon the business enterprises as here alleged? The voice of Mr. Hexter has been extinguished by death. The complainant is reduced to silence by our statute. R.S. 2:97-2; N.J.S.A. 2:97-2. Here, also, the quandary increases in perplexity because there is little oral testimony upon which some shadow of self-interest or improbability has not fallen.
The inquiry is rendered necessary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Bank of Rockville Center Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Soper v. CiscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Riehl v. RiehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Burke v. GuntherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Lutjen v. LutjenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. TurroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Zucker v. SilversteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Giacobbi v. AnselmiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.