Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Dixon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 2008No. 2008-B-1618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

996 So.2d 1029 (2008)

In re Jerome W. DIXON.

No. 2008-B-1618.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 2, 2008.

Charles Bennett Plattsmier, G. Fred Ours, Baton Rouge, for applicant.

James Ronald Clary, Jr., Baton Rouge, Jerome Wayne Dixon, for respondent.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Jerome W. Dixon, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The underlying facts of this matter are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties. Respondent…

Also in this document: Dissent · Kimball; Dissent · Kimball.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. In re AugustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. In re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API