Legal Opinion

State v. Tripp

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 12, 2004No. 03-001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant appeals from a conditional guilty plea to possession of marijuana. He claims the court should have suppressed certain evidence because it was gathered in violation of Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution. We affirm because defendant waived the issue.

¶ 2. Defendant pled guilty after our remand in State v. Schofner, 174 Vt. 430, 434, 800 A.2d 1072, 1077 (2002) (mem.), an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence. At issue in the interlocutory appeal was whether the trial court properly suppressed evidence collected pursuant to a search warrant. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SchofnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In re CrannellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API