Legal Opinion
United States v. Olander
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 2009No. 08-30180PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
David Lee Olander appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge against him for receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A). He argues that the sentencing scheme in § 2252A(b) and the legislative histories of the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977; the Child Protection Act of 1984; the Child Protection Restoration and Penalties Enhancement Act of 1990; and the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 indicate that the crime of receiving child pornography includes among its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- The Wilderness Society Alaska Center for the Environment v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Clarence Kenneth GormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Cosmetic Ideas, Inc. v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- United States v. Micah Iverson KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.