Matulewicz v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
One who owns and wishes to divide a tract of land may seek, under § 8 IP of the subdivision control law (G. L. c. 41, §§ 81K-81GG), an endorsement from a planning board that approval under the subdivision control law is not required (hereafter ANR endorsement). G. L. c. 41, § 8 IP.3 This endorse*38ment “shall not be withheld unless the plan shows a subdivision.” Id. The term “subdivision” is defined to exclude a parcel if, inter alia, “every lot within the tract so divided has frontage on (a) a public way or a way which the clerk of the city or town certifies is maintained and used as a public…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Insurance Rating Board v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- In Re Civil Investigative Demand Addressed to Yankee Milk, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Rettig v. Planning Board of RowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Casagrande v. Town Clerk of HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. Lam Builders, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005
- Johnson v. ConnorsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
- TOWN OF CONCORD v. NEIL E. RASMUSSEN & OthersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025