Legal Opinion

In Re Wells Fargo Cash Sweep Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 27, 2025No. 3:24-cv-04616Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In Re Wells Fargo Cash Sweep Litigation Case No. 24-cv-04616-VC ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 132 The motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The claims for breach of contract based on the “excessive fees” theory, breach of fiduciary duty for non-advisory clients, and unjust enrichment are dismissed. WFC and FiNet are also dismissed. All other claims remain. This order assumes the reader’s familiarity with the facts, relevant legal standards, and arguments made by the parties. 1. Statute of Limitations.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Spinelli v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Kamco Supply Corp. v. On the Right Track, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API