Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Alexander
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2013No. 12-30156PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a counterfeit paper check that bears a victim’s true name, bank account number, and routing number is a “means of identification of another person” for the purposes of the aggravated identity theft statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1028A, 1028(d)(7). The district court answered in the affirmative and returned a judgment of conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and, for the following reasons, we affirm.
I
While employed as a newspaper deliveryman, Robert Kent Alexander stole mail belonging to two individuals who resided along his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. BlixtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Joel Andrew Wyatt, AKA "Lupine" Rebecca Kay SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Marc KeyserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Raizel Blumberger v. Ian TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Kenvis NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. HaugrudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Rodney FosterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.