Legal Opinion
State v. Chapman
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 27, 2008No. 33859PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Charles V. Chapman appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine, asserting that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found after a traffic stop. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
After he was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine, Chapman filed a motion to suppress evidence. From the evi dence submitted at a hearing on the motion, the following uncontroverted facts were established.
On an interstate highway, an Idaho State Police trooper observed two vehicles, a car and an SUV, that appeared to be exceeding the speed limit. The trooper…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. FrandsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Keith A. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Scott NicholsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010