Legal Opinion

Reason v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1978No. 10755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Nathaniel Reason duly and timely appeared in a magistrate’s court in Las Vegas for a scheduled preliminary examination. The prosecuting attorney was not prepared to go forward because he had not arranged to have “certain necessary physical evidence” available at the hearing.

Reason’s motion to dismiss was denied and the hearing was continued on the oral request of the prosecuting attorney. Reason then petitioned for habeas corpus and has appealed from the order denying the requested relief.

We have previously held that when a prosecuting attorney is not prepared to go forward with a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. McNair v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bustos v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Salas v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API