Norton v. Cooley

Concurring Opinion

White, J.

The evidence most favorable to appellee as correctly summarized in the opinion by Presiding Justice *520Hoffman is sufficient to prove that plaintiff-appellee was libeled and thereby damaged to such an extent that the sum awarded to him is not excessive. Therefore, I am happy to concur.

My only purpose in writing this opinion is to make it clear that even if the complaint had not made “the proper aver-ments, inducement, colloquium and innuendo”, we would not have reversed for error in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.

Burns Ind. Stat. Ann. (1968 Repl.) § 2-1013…