Legal Opinion
EGLESTON v. McCLENDON
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 19, 2013No. 111,833PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Chief Judge.
T1 Plaintiff/Appellant Gregory M. Egle-ston (Plaintiff), derivatively on behalf of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Nominal Defendant/Ap-pellee Chesapeake Energy Corporation (Chesapeake). Plaintiff asserts the trial court erred in dismissing his Verified Shareholder's Derivative and Demand Refused Petition on the finding that Chesapeake's current Board of Directors, Defendants Aubrey K. McClendon, Archie W. Dunham, Frederic M. Poses, Bob G. Alexander, R. Brad Martin, Vincent J. Intrieri, Merrill…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- EGLESTON v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- EGLESTON v. McCLENDONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- EGLESTON v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- HOWARD and HOWARD v. THE BARRINGTON HOMEOWNERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2026
- Haddan v. The Coves Master Association, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2025