Legal Opinion

Fred Stein v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1959No. 16309PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

The principal question for determination in this case is whether appellant Stein at the trial in which he was convicted received the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. During the course of preliminaries to the actual trial, at least three lawyers of his own choosing appeared — a Mr. Weiss, a Mr. Sherman and a Mr. Sweeney. Of the three, Mr. Sweeney seems to have made more court appearances. Three continuances were granted. The last continuance was for a period from August 12th to September 16th. Mr. Sweeney…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Gilbert M. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. Ruben Dario Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  5. District of Columbia v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Fred Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Fred Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Angus v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Stein v. WillinghamDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API