Hurt v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky
Action on Policy of Accident Insurance. On demurrer to petition.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The defendant, under date of October 10, 1900, issued to the plaintiff’s intestate a policy of insurance, which, very long and elaborate, is not set out in full, although those characteristics might serve to illustrate the important questions to be determined. It provides that:
“The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, of London, England, in consideration of the warranties hereinafter set forth, and of Twenty ° 0/100 Dollars, does hereby insure S. W. Francis of Iron Bridge engaged in the business or occupation of a Tobacco Buyer under classification Pfd…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Trippe v. Provident Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- McFarland v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jaloff v. United Auto Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Basic Building & Loan Ass'n of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Hirsch-Fauth Furniture Co. v. Continental Ins.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1928
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933