Legal Opinion

Mowrer v. Poirier & McLane Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1955No. Appeal, 51PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

The controlling question is whether plaintiff is a third-party beneficiary of a contract between defendant and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

*4The contract with the Commonwealth called for the construction by defendant, Poirier & McLane Corporation, of an impounding dam on the Schuykill River. Paragraph 21a provided that “The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this contract, such Public Liability and Property Damage insurance as shall protect him, and any subcontractor performing work covered by this contract, from claims for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Keefer v. LombardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Burke v. North Huntingdon TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. Nyce Crete Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Anderson v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API