Legal Opinion
Weitzman v. Stein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1978No. 70 Civ. 4037 (LFM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
After trial of this securities fraud action, we rendered judgment for the plaintiff, holding, inter alia, that his damages consisted of two Florida state court judgments entered against him by two brokerage houses, H. Hentz & Co. (“Hentz”) and Dishey, Easton & Co. (“Dishey”). Weitzman v. Stein, 436 F.Supp. 895 (S.D.N.Y.1977). Because no proof was offered at trial as to the amount of the judgments, or as to the amount of plaintiff’s actual losses arising therefrom, the court referred the case to Magistrate Sol Schreiber to hear and report on the amount of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. FleschnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Ltd., Inc. v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Weitzman v. FIF Consultants, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985