Legal Opinion
Bowens v. Aftermath Entertainment
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 2005No. CIV. 02-40170PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment brought by the parties. A hearing on the motions was held on March 21, 2005. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion and deny Plaintiffs’ motion. The Court will also deny all parties’ motions for sanctions.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court previously recounted the alleged factual background of this matter in a memorandum opinion and order denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss, as follows:
On July 6, 2000, rap music artists Andre Young, Snoop…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reid v. Thetford TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- A&W X-Press, Inc. v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022