Legal Opinion

Wade v. Farnsworth

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1996No. 16930Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment validating certain liens that were imposed upon Plaintiffs’ real property. Defendants Farnsworth and Houston Lumber both filed cross-appeals. Our first calendar notice proposed to affirm the judgment in all respects, and Plaintiffs have responded with a memorandum in opposition. Neither Farnsworth nor Houston filed memoranda opposing the proposed affirmance. We are not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ memorandum and affirm for the reasons stated below. In addition, given the other parties’ lack of response to the calendar…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frick v. VeazeyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Jackson v. A.B.Z. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Allen v. Amoco Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Garcia v. ThongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. C & D PLUMBING, INC. v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API