Friedman v. Weisz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the Probate Court of Pawnee County; before-James P. Neal, Probate Judge. Action by Maurice Weisz against M. Friedman.. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error..
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
In the probate court of Pawnee-county M. Weisz brought an action against M. Friedman to recover the sum of $300 on account for coffee and soap-purchased from April' to- June, 1897. The defendant answered, admitting the correctness of the account, and pleaded four separate defenses by way of -set-off. The-first defense alleged that Weisz was indebted to- Friedman on an open account in the sum -of $1,059.85, as- shown- by an itemized statement accompanying the pleading. The-second defense alleged- th-e sale and conveyance by Weisz to Friedman of certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Provins v. LoviSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Homire v. RodgersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Douglas v. WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Jay v. ZeissnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Kœnig v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stagner v. FilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- San Bois Coal Co. v. ResetzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.