Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter P. Mann III
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1989No. 86-2585PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Walter P. Mann III, appearing pro se and assisted by appointed standby counsel, was convicted by a jury on four mail fraud counts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, one count of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and three counts of willful failure to file income tax returns in violation of 26 I.R.C. § 7203. Mann challenges these convictions on the grounds that 1) the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions, 2) the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury regarding Mann’s good-faith defense to the willful failure to file charge,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Al TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Anthony TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Steven J. Devries, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.