Legal Opinion

Investors' Syndicate v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1933No. 3 Div. 52PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The question here presented is: What was the “actual amount of capital employed in this State” by Investors’ Syndicate, a foreign corporation, for the purpose of fixing the franchise tax for 1932, pursuant to section 232 of the Constitution of Alabama, as further defined by Acts of 1927, page 176, Section 54?

This court has recently considered and carefully defined “capital employed in this State.” Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. State, 223 Ala. 332, 135 So. 346; State v. National Cash Credit Ass’n, 224 Ala. 629, 141 So. 541.

We are not convinced there is any ground for criticism or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Assessors of the Parish v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. State v. National Cash Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. State v. Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. State v. Southern Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. International Paper Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Hollingsworth & Whitney Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API