Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth & Whitney Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1941No. 3 Div. 334PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question now to be determined is whether the amount of the franchise tax on a foreign corporation qualified to do business in Alab.ama should be computed on the value of certain items to which reference will be made.

The charter of the corporation specified that its purposes are to manufacture “paper pulp and paper bags and the purchase and sale of paper, paper bags, twine, paper stock, chemicals and such other merchandise as is usually bought and sold in connection with the paper trade.”

The taxpayer proposed to erect and operate a large paper mill in Alabama, and began to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Southern Natural Gas Corp. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. State v. Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Friedlander Bros. v. DealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Alabama Textile Products Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. State v. Plantation Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. State v. Aluminum Ore Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. State v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API