Legal Opinion

Broders v. Bohannon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Linn: H. H. Hewitt, Judge. Action by H. Broders against J. C. Bohannon and others to foreclose a chattel mortgage. From a decree in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

This controversy arises out of the following facts: In November, 1892, the defendant Bohannon leased a certain farm in Linn County for the term of two years, at a rental of $1,200, payable one-half on or before October 1, 1893, a*id the remainder on or before October 1, 1894. By the terms of the lease under which he held, it was stipulated “that all crops, of whatsoever nature, raised on said premises each year should remain and be the property of the party of the first part (landlord) until the rents, as above specified, are fully paid to the said first party.” In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox, Baum & Co. v. KcKinney & SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dilenbeck v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Cole v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Tallman v. HavillOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API