Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1997No. 77,569Published

1DissentLarson, J.

I disagree with the holding of the majority that we have jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

It is a well-settled rule that when an issue is neither briefed nor argued on appeal, that issue is deemed to have been abandoned. State v. Pratt, 255 Kan. 767, Syl. ¶ 4, 876 P.2d 1390 (1994); State v. Mims, 222 Kan. 335, Syl. ¶ 6,564 P.2d 531 (1977). It has further been our rule that when a defendant in a criminal case asserts a claim of error and withdraws the same from the court’s consideration, the claim of error is deemed abandoned and cannot be reasserted as the basis for a second appeal. State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. HerveyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API