Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1993No. 67,855PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Ronald Smith appeals from the trial court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction to hear his second motion to modify the sentences imposed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the motion to modify (State v. Smith, 17 Kan. App. 2d 746, 843 P.2d 297 [1992]). The matter is before us on petition for review.

The sole issue presented concerns the extent of the grant of jurisdiction afforded by K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-4603(4) to a trial court to modify a sentence. The statute provides:

“(a) Except when an appeal is taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. VanweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. HerveyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API