State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
Ronald Smith appeals from the trial court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction to hear his second motion to modify the sentences imposed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the motion to modify (State v. Smith, 17 Kan. App. 2d 746, 843 P.2d 297 [1992]). The matter is before us on petition for review.
The sole issue presented concerns the extent of the grant of jurisdiction afforded by K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-4603(4) to a trial court to modify a sentence. The statute provides:
“(a) Except when an appeal is taken…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. VanweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. HerveyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.