Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lang v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1985No. 1026-82Published

1DissentTeague, Judge

I must respectfully dissent to the majority opinion because I believe that the opinion authored by Chief Justice Guittard of the Dallas Court of Appeals, see Lang v. State, 642 S.W.2d 68 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1982), has correctly decided the issue that is now before this Court; thus, such decision should not be disturbed by this Court.

Furthermore, but because I am compelled to continue to subscribe to my view that this Court’s decision of Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) (Opinion on State’s Motion for Rehearing), see my previous comments stated in the opinions I filed, see, for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Doyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Kucha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Bonfanti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API