Legal Opinion

State v. Stanford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 2005No. COA04-637Published

1Opinion of the Court

*469ELMORE, Judge.

Jerry Stanford (defendant) appeals his convictions for sexual offense in the second degree, rape in the second degree, and taking indecent liberties with a minor on the basis that 1) the delay prior to indictment violated his due process rights and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the charge of indecent liberties. We affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss for pre-indictment delay, but reverse the denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the indecent liberties charge.

The offenses defendant was convicted for occurred in the months of March,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API