Legal Opinion

State v. Malloy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 9, 1983No. 12A83PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The determinative question presented is whether there was sufficient evidence introduced at trial to withstand the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We hold that there was not.

The State introduced evidence tending to show inter alia that Todd’s Gun Shop was broken into during September of 1980. All of the guns in the shop were stolen at that time. A day or two after the guns were stolen, undercover federal law enforcement agents went to a parking lot in Wilmington looking for the defendant. They eventually found the defendant there working on an automobile. They called him and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. PooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API