Legal Opinion

Malone Coal, Grain & Motor Co. v. Hale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1922No. 6 Div. 644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This is an appeal from the action of the trial court in granting a new trial for the defendant upon the sole ground of newly discovered evidence. Among other prerequisites to a motion for a new trial for newly discovered evidence it should set forth the names of the witnesses who would testify to the facts alleged, and be'accompanied by the affidavits of said witnesses. The record discloses no affidavit' from Crowden as to the substance”, or truth of the evidence as alleged in the motion and affidavit of counsel to have been divulged to him by said Crowden. McLeod v. Shelly Co., 108 Ala. 81,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Shelly Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Schlaff v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. YanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. National Security Insurance Company v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Emmett v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API