Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Lentz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1988No. 87-2429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

Plaintiff appeals from an order in an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief (1) directing defendants to disclose some, but not all, of the information he requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 116, par. 201 et seq.), and (2) denying his request for attorney fees.

A previous appeal in this case was dismissed by us for lack of jurisdiction where plaintiff’s claim for attorney fees was still pending and the trial court’s order relating to the disclosure of the information at issue did not contain the requisite finding under Supreme Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Joseph Falcone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Mary Williams Cazalas v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Family Life League v. Department of Public AidIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamer v. LentzIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People Ex Rel. Ulrich v. StukelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Healey v. Teachers Retirement SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Kenyon v. GarrelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API