Legal Opinion
In Re D.D., 22740 (2-20-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 2009No. 22740PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} D.D. was adjudicated a delinquent child by the juvenile court, following a hearing in which two victims of an aggravated robbery positively identified D.D. as the perpetrator. The court ordered D.D. placed on intensive supervision probation. D.D. filed a timely notice of appeal. FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
{¶ 2} "THE APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BASED UPON A FAILURE TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE PRETRIAL IDENTIFICATIONS."
{¶ 3} Counsel's performance will not be deemed ineffective unless and until counsel's performance is proved to have fallen below…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FriersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CraverOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. HofackerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. HopkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025