Legal Opinion

State v. Frierson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2018No. 105618PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY J. BOYLE, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Ersa Frierson, appeals his conviction. He raises six assignments of error on appeal:

1. Trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to challenge the single photo identification of the appellant as the alleged offender.

2. Trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to object to critical hearsay evidence that was used to connect him to the crime alleged.

3. Counsel was ineffective when he failed to request closing arguments.

4. The appellant was not provided the effective assistance of counsel where his lawyer failed to obtain the assistance of any…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MireeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. KnightOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. MathisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API