Legal Opinion

Kik v. Sbraccia

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 2007No. Docket 256419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.

This conflict panel was convened to resolve an inconsistency between the vacated portion of this Court’s prior opinion in Kik v Sbraccia, 268 Mich App 690; 708 NW2d 766 (2005) (Kik I), vacated in part 268 Mich App 801 (2005), and this Court’s earlier decision in Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005). In accordance with *390MCR 7.215(J)(1), the panel in Kik I was required to follow the precedent of Wesche, which held that loss-of-consortium claims are not included in the motor-vehicle exception to governmental immunity found in MCL 691.1405 and that such claims were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Daniel John Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rebecca Kik v. John-Christopher SbracciaMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API