Kik v. Sbraccia
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.
This conflict panel was convened to resolve an inconsistency between the vacated portion of this Court’s prior opinion in Kik v Sbraccia, 268 Mich App 690; 708 NW2d 766 (2005) (Kik I), vacated in part 268 Mich App 801 (2005), and this Court’s earlier decision in Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005). In accordance with *390MCR 7.215(J)(1), the panel in Kik I was required to follow the precedent of Wesche, which held that loss-of-consortium claims are not included in the motor-vehicle exception to governmental immunity found in MCL 691.1405 and that such claims were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Daniel John Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Rebecca Kik v. John-Christopher SbracciaMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008