Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Riverside Co-Operative Club
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1905No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Brooke and Frazer, JJ. Information in equity by Ormond F. Hunt, prosecuting attorney of Wayne county, against the Riverside CoOperative Club and the Master Plumbers’ Association to restrain further violation of the anti-trust law. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCaepentee, J.
Section 1, Act No. 255, Pub. Acts 1899, reads as follows:
"That a trust is a combination of capital, skill or arts by two or more persons, firms, partnerships, corporations or associations of persons, or of any two or more of them, for either, any or all of the following purposes:
“ 1. To create or carry out restrictions in trade or commerce.
“2. To limit or reduce the production, or increase or reduce the price of, merchandise or any commodity.
“3. To prevent competition in manufacturing, making, transportation, sale or purchase of merchandise, produce or any commodity.
“4. To fix any standard or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beck v. Railway Teamsters' Protective UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Harding v. American Glucose Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cleland v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- State of Texas v. Laredo Ice Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. PalssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rohlf v. KasemeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- STAEBLER-KEMPE OIL CO. v. Mac's Auto Mart, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.