Legal Opinion
Gray v. Doyle
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 26, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
This action was instituted in the circuit court against Caney Creek Drainage District, J. P. Doyle, I. M. Huskey and S.E. Pinkerston, commissioners, and J. P. Doyle, I. M. Huskey and S.E. Pinkerston, individually, to recover the sum of $700, alleged to be the value of land damaged by them in the construction of a drainage ditch.
It appears from the record that Caney Creek Drainage District was created under the general drainage laws of the State for the purpose of draining certain lands in Lawrence County, Arkansas. The drainage ditch came down from the foothills into Caney…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Catlett v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Board of Improvement of Sewer District Number 2 v. MorelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Road District No. 6 v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Francis Drainage District v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Beaver Bayou Drainage District v. Lee-Phillips Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- FRANCIS DRAINAGE DISTRICT v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956