Legal Opinion
United States v. Cotton Valley Operators Committee
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided January 21, 1948No. Civ. A. 2209PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
The Government brought this suit under the provisions of Section 4 of the Act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, commonly known as the Sherman Anti-Trust Law, charging some fifteen corporations and eighteen individuals, with conspiring to “restrain unreasonably and to monopolize trade and commerce in the liquid and gaseous carbohydrates” taken from the Cotton Valley Field of Webster Parish, as follows:
“Said combination and conspiracy has consisted of a continuing agreement and concert of action among the defendants the substantial terms of which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Wisconsin Alumni Research FoundationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Dreskin v. ZinkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. v. Eastern Railroad Presidents ConferenceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States v. Cotton Valley Operators CommitteeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1949
- In Re GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Benford v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
- Benford v. American Broadcasting CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.