Legal Opinion
Washington v. Barry
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 28, 2002No. 95,162PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{ 1 The only recitation of facts in the ree-ord comes from plaintiffs verified petition and other filings because the trial court dismissed plaintiff's petition on the State's motion. Consequently, the facts set out in this opinion come exclusively from plaintiffs petition and other filings.
T2 On February 9, 2000, plaintiff was incarcerated in a cell in the Disciplinary Segregation Unit of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary at McAlester. He objected to prison authorities putting another inmate in his cell, saying, "Plaintiff did…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- PERRY v. CITY OF NORMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Bryson v. Oklahoma County ex rel. Oklahoma County Detention CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- PAYNE v. KERNSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.