Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7279(PNL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are convicted defendants who bring this action for breach of contract alleging that they had a cooperation agreement with the Government requiring that they be placed in the United States Marshal’s Witness Protection Program. The Government denies such an agreement was made. Plaintiffs, who are incarcerated and are proceeding in forma pauperis, move for an order directing the defendant to advance stenographic costs of three depositions plaintiffs’ attorney wishes to take. Plaintiffs contend that these depositions are “critical to the proper advancement of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- Toliver v. Community Action Commission to Help Economy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Ebenhart v. PowerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Cooke v. Universal Pictures CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Robbins v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Badman v. StarkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Alfred Copeland v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Baum v. Village of ChittenangoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.