Standard Bank of Canada v. Lowman
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The issues in the instant eases are of fact and law, tried before the court, a jury having been waived. From no point of approach can I conclude that the plaintiff has sustained the burden of proof resting upon it, and where the burden rests upon the defendants to the extent as herein stated, I believe it has been sustained.
The plaintiff, without doubt, consented to the removal of the salmon by the C. L. Packing Company, Limited, from British Columbia to Anacortes, Wash. I believe it to have been the understanding between the plaintiff bank and the C. L.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simpson & Doeller Co. v. Sears & Nichols Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1938