Legal Opinion

Standard Bank of Canada v. Lowman

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 24, 1924No. 150-152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The issues in the instant eases are of fact and law, tried before the court, a jury having been waived. From no point of approach can I conclude that the plaintiff has sustained the burden of proof resting upon it, and where the burden rests upon the defendants to the extent as herein stated, I believe it has been sustained.

The plaintiff, without doubt, consented to the removal of the salmon by the C. L. Packing Company, Limited, from British Columbia to Anacortes, Wash. I believe it to have been the understanding between the plaintiff bank and the C. L.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simpson & Doeller Co. v. Sears & Nichols Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API