Legal Opinion
Williams v. Mead Coated Board, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided October 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-D-7-EPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DE MENT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Michael L. Williams, Wonder B. Henry, Jr., and Carey Ford, brought this action against Mead Coated Board, Inc., pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiffs asserted claims under both the disparate impact theory and the disparate treatment theory.
The trial of this action began on May 12, 1993. Plaintiffs rested their case on May 19, 1993. Defendant, Mead Coated Board, Inc. (“defendant” or “Mead”), then filed a motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52(c) of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Givhan v. Electronic Engineers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Bivins v. Jeffers Vet SupplyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
- Nash v. Consolidated City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Schupbach v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Alford v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.