Legal Opinion
Hueter v. Kruse
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 19, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00415Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER, ET CIV. NO. 21-00415 JMS-KJM AL., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING vs. ORDER, ECF NO. 12 LEALAIALOA FRITZ MICHAEL KRUSE, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, ECF NO. 12 I. INTRODUCTION This case is yet another action filed by pro se Plaintiffs Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli, and Michael “Candyman” Kirk (“Plaintiffs”), making similar if not identical claims to earlier-filed actions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.