Legal Opinion

Corey v. City of Ann Arbor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Ratie E. Corey against tbe city of Ann Arbor for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHookee, C. J.

The circuit judge who tried this cause directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff has brought the case to this court by writ of error. She was injured through a fall upon an icy sidewalk, the ice being occasioned by the freezing of water which flowed upon the sidewalk from a hydrant upon the premises of an adjacent proprietor, according to the plaintiff’s claim. Defendant’s counsel maintain that it was not shown that she fell upon this ice, but we think there was testimony from which it might be inferred. The questions in the case are (1) whether the city is chargeable with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corey v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Peters v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wilson v. Alpena County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Jones v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Holland v. County of AlleganMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API